Benchmarks
Episodes are designed to support comparisons at the same points in a case. Clinical Reasoning Bench, in development, examines decisions as information becomes available, including predictions made before test results are revealed.
Data
Each visit is designed to become an episode: one dated record of what was expected, what was found and what happened next.
Persistent tiredness
The model is asked to reason as the record becomes available.
Symptom history recorded
OrderBlood count requested
ExpectedHaemoglobin below the reference range
Test result withheld at this checkpoint.
FoundHaemoglobin within the reference range
Earlier expectation: retained alongside the new finding.
Still reported, cause unresolved
Tiredness is still reported. The cause remains unresolved in this illustrative record.
The dates, reasoning and findings here are fictional. They show the shape of an episode.
Follow-up adds evidence obtained later. The evaluation method is designed to compare a model’s predictions with that outcome, including when the record remains unresolved.
Episodes are designed to support comparisons at the same points in a case. Clinical Reasoning Bench, in development, examines decisions as information becomes available, including predictions made before test results are revealed.
Research records are designed to keep the question, the evidence available at the time and the later findings together. The sequence gives context to an answer.
Episodes are intended to support reinforcement learning environments, designed to let a model work through decisions as new evidence arrives.
The method is designed to support evaluation against the outcome at follow-up. Keeping predictions separate from later evidence makes the basis of a decision available for review.
The dated record is designed to support reports of the method, the evidence and its limits. Research publications are an intended output of this work.
The preparation method is designed to separate identifying information from research records and retain a record of what was changed or withheld. This work remains in development.
Researchers request access with a short form. Once approved, they sign in at crbench.arcophos.com with an emailed link to inspect the Clinical Reasoning Bench sample. The public sample and tools below can be explored directly.
The public sample includes tasks, rubric criteria and reference responses. It is available under CC BY-NC 4.0.
Arcophos Evals provides an Inspect task pack and a reference runner with the same grading protocol. The code is MIT licensed. A sample run is not expected to reproduce a full leaderboard score exactly.
Clinical Benchmarks Index result tables and source records are available as CSV and JSON under CC BY 4.0. Each published result can be traced to its supporting document.